Wednesday, 29 March 2017

THE MARKETING MIX OF THE RAZOR INDUSTRY



The marketing mix is described by Dibb et al as a “toolkit” utilised by organisations to allow for the satisfying transaction of goods or services (2016 p2).  The concept of applying a mix of marketing procedures was originally developed in the 1950s by Neil Borden of Harvard University.  It was later simplified to the now extensively used 4 Ps of product, price, place and promotion, by Eugine McCarthy in the 1960s (Baines and Fill, 2014 p16).


This blog will assess the razor industry and ways in which the marketing mix variables are used.  Particular consideration is given to the contrasting approaches used by market leader Gillette and industry disruptor Dollar Shave Club (DSC).
Brooks and Simkin (2012) suggest that there is no “magic bullet” for effective marketing, The diverse approaches to the marketing mix in the pogontomy domain validate this theory.




PRODUCT


The product variable of the marketing mix is concerned with assessing customers’ expectations to create or alter a product to best satisfy them (Dibb et al, 2016 p28).  A product is not necessarily tangible.  An idea or a service can also be described as a product (Dibb et al, 2016 p311).




BRANDING

A product is distinguished from its competitors by its brand.  A brand adds value and gives a commodity a personality (Baines and Fill, 2014 p 456).
DSC’s distinct brand identity was built through video marketing.  Their CEO describes their videos as being the heartbeat of the brand (Gesenhues, 2016).  Barker et al propose that strong connections can be built by giving a brand a human face (2017 p66).  This could account for DSC’s success as the videos they produce are irreverent, funny and relatable.  The first video, titled “Our Blades are F***ing Great” was posted on YouTube in 2012.  It featured Michael Dubin, founder and then CEO talking directly to the camera and explaining the premise of the club (Barker et al, 2017).  He lightheartedly mocks the industry leaders and suggests that there is no need to buy a premium brand as the money is spent on celebrity endorsement and enhancements not required for shaving.  The quality of the razors, convenience of having them sent directly and a transparent price point are also highlighted in an authentic and conversational manner (Dollarshaveclub.com, 2017).  This creativity and the humour of the brand are consistent throughout their videos, website, social media and even the product packaging.

Dollar Shave Club founder Michael Dubin introduces the concept.

Gillette’s brand image is somewhat contrasting.  It is more aspirational than relatable.  Since their 1989 Super Bowl XXIII campaign they have marketed their gents brand as “The best a man can get”.  This unattainable yet desirable sentiment is also articulated in their Venus female range, which uses the ad line “reveal the goddess within” (Adage, 2017).  


PRODUCT MIX


The product mix describes all products offered by an organisationTypically, to satisfy various target markets, a variety of products are presented (Baines and Fill, 2014 p286).  Within the razor industry, in keeping with this practice, most organisations offer more than solely razors.  DSC keep their product mix small and exclusively target men.  They offer three variations of blades and handles, skincare, and hairstyling (Dollarshaveclub.com, 2017).  This allows them to manage their market more easily and specialize in these areas.
Gillette have more depth to their male product line.  22 different types of razor are marketed to men.  They have various distinctions, such as disposable, body, electric and even vibrating.  They have an extensive range of pre and post shave treatments, deodorants, body washes and anti-perspirants (Gillette.com, 2017).  Furthermore, Gillette show product width by additionally marketing to female consumers with their Venus range.  This product line is extensive, with 27 variations of razors and a collection of shaving gels and oils, 
        

The full range of Gillette products can be viewed on their website Gillette.com



PACKAGING

Packaging is useful for both functionality and for showcasing a brand identity.  It can aid a product’s appeal by making it easier to use, more attractive or safer (Dibb et al, 2016 p334).


Schick, known as Wilkinson Sword in the UK, indicate on their website that packaging is significant to them and they aim for it to be both informative and functional.  The packaging keeps the product safe and clean and gives the consumer product information.  Their branding is also strong in their packaging, with the theme of water displayed throughout the product line to highlight the moisturising qualities of the range (Shick.com, 2017). 





In recent years, a growing concern for corporations and for consumers regarding packaging is environmental awareness (Dibb et al, 2016 p366).  In 2011 Gillette, in keeping with parent company P&G’s sustainability goal for 2020, redesigned the packaging for their Fusion Pro Glide range.  It is now smaller and lighter, therefore using less material.  It is also 100% PVC free, instead using moldable pulp from bamboo, sugarcane and bulrush (P&G factsheet, 2011).





DSC have chosen to use their packaging to further connect to club members and reinforce their brand with yet more irreverent humor.  One DSC member, content strategist and blogger Jonathon Colman, shared his “unboxing” experience.  He conversed about how well DSC have achieved brand consistency across channels.  The packaging itself has a wood paneling effect, which is reminiscent of the office shown in the marketing video.  The caption “shave time, shave money” along with the company logo is the first visual. The literature inside is a welcome to the club with more jokes and humorous captions such as “Congrats on making the best decision you have made in a long time.  You’re now part of an elite group of stratospheric thinkers.  You’ll fit right in”.  The packaging is modern, attractive and is made from recyclable cardboard (Coleman, 2012).



PLACE

The place, or distribution element of the marketing mix is focused on how an organisation satisfies a customer’s needs (Baines and Fill, 2014 p16).  An organisation is concerned with ensuring that there are sufficient products available to customers when and where they are desired, while also keeping costs to a minimum (Dibb et al, 2016 p 29). 




CHANEL INTENSITY

A business can distribute their product in one of three ways.  Intensively, through any reasonable market outlet, selectively, through multiple outlets, or exclusively through a single intermediary (Baines and Fill, 2014 p429).






Due to their subscription business model, DSC use exclusive distribution.  Products can only be purchased by joining their club and are only available directly.  This distribution channel allows DSC to have absolute control with issues such as price stability, image and quality of service (Baines and Fill, 2014 p431).
For most other razor manufactures, such as Gillette, Schick, Bic and Braun an intensive distribution strategy is used.  They can be found in supermarkets, chemists, local shops and various online retailers.  The advantage of this distribution channel is that buyers will have optimal means of access to the products, thus increasing accessibility and the likelihood of impulse buying (Baines and Fill, 2014 p429).



ONLINE PRESENCE

Dibb et al (2016 p89) propose that the emergence of social media has changed the boundaries for organisations with regards to online presence.  A website alone is no longer sufficient means to engage customers in communication and commercial transactions.
In terms of social media marketing there are two categories.  Interruption, which is paid for social advertising, and the more organic permission approach where consumers have a choice to view or not (Barker et al, 2017 p 63).


DSC were a disruptor to a near monopoly in the U.S razor industry.  They used “permission marketing” and their online presence as their strongest weapon.  Permission marketing is, as the name suggests, marketing in which consumers agree to, welcome, or feel adds value to their lives.  Their comedic and highly popular YouTube video went online in the U.S on March 1st, 2012 and by September 2015 they had already surpassed Schick in terms of razor blade cartridge sales.  They are now second only to Gillette (Barker et al, 2017 p 62-63).  DSC’s CMO describes their technique as storytelling rather than just selling.  He articulates that videos should reward consumers for giving a moment of their time.  People watch DSC’s videos because they want to, not because they have to (Gesenhues, 2016).

Social media is described by Mangold and Faulds (2009) as the new hybrid element of the promotional mix.  Schick, DSC and Gillette all use social media such as Twitter and Facebook to create a community feeling.  They share tips and jokes with their followers, but ultimately all routes lead back to their websites where products can be purchased.

TWITTER LINKS... you will not be disappointed! 
Dollar Shave Club Twitter                 Gillette Twitter




DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS

The primary objective when deciding on a distribution channel is to ensure that the desired product is available in the right place at the right time when a consumer needs it (Dibb et al, 2016 p 616).
DSC use a subscription based business model, where anybody can join the “club” for as little as $1 and have razors sent directly to their home each month.  Initially, as a welcome, new club members will receive handles and a full pack of cartridges.  They will then pay a monthly subscription and decide on their own frequency and any additional extras required.  DSC tell patrons that with this distribution channel they will never forget to buy razors, and therefore never run out.  It is a low commitment subscription and users are free to cancel at any time (Dollarshaveclub.com, 2017). 
Since launching in 2012, DSC have altered the distribution landscape within the U.S razor market.  “Shave clubs” have become increasingly popular with companies such as Harry’s, 800 Razors and Bevel adopting similar marketing models (Barry et al, 2016).  Gillette themselves, after a 13.5% loss of market share to DSC, have now introduced their own shave club (Whipp, 2017).  Cook and Garver (2012) suggest that superior customer satisfaction and value can be gained through subscription relationships, and that vast opportunities loom for organisations who successfully exploit them.



PRICE


Dibb et al explain that to a buyer, the price placed upon a commodity is its perceived value.  They go on to say that when setting a price, an organisation must account for many factors.  Market conditions, competition and the economy should all be evaluated.  They must employ careful judgement to ensure that the customer believes they are getting value for money (2016 p579-580).  Price is interrelated with each of the other marketing mix variables, and any pricing decision will influence them (Dibb et al, 2016 p586).





PRICING STRATEGY

For DSC price is at the core of both their business model and their marketing mix, so much so it features in their company name.  Dibb et al explain that an organisation uses a pricing strategy to achieve both marketing and pricing objectives (2016, p608).   As with their brand DSC’s focus when it come to a pricing strategy is transparency.  The name “Dollar Shave Club” gives reference to the most modest of their subscription packages.   “The  Humble Twin”  retails at $1 per month.  For this price, which is far below the market average, buyers receive a handle with 5 razor cartridges on the first month and 5 refill cartridges every month thereafter (Dollarshaveclub.com, 2017). 

The practice of setting a low price to attract customers with the intention of also selling higher priced items is called bait pricing (Dibb et al, 2016 p605).   Once the $1 bait price has led buyers to DSC’s website they have the option of upgrading their subscription to superior products for either $6 or $9 per month.  Additional skin care products can also be purchased.  DSC’s strategy would have been considered penetration pricing when they first entered the market.  The price is lower than their competitors and this allowed them to gain a sizable share of the market.  This pricing strategy has been consistent for DSC since they first entered the market (Vinjamuri, 2012).  DSC's prices can all be seen by following the link below to their website.


Dollar Shave Club Website



INFLUENCES UPON PRICING AND CHANGING PRICE

Gillette held the majority of the U.S razor market until DSC materialised (Vinjamuri, 2012).  They traditionally employed a non-price competition approach, emphasising instead their quality.  Gillette belong to the Proctor and Gamble (P&G) group and are one of their most profitable businesses.  Operating margins for their razors are 29% and until recently there was no reason for them to change their pricing strategy (McMahon et al, 2016).  A Wall Street Journal article from 2017 suggests that marketers do not pay enough attention to the price element of the marketing mix.  For Gillette specifically their obliviousness to buyers looking for a more reasonable priced quality razor may have cost them significant market share (Glazer, 2017).  A low cost entrant can alter the entire market structure (Brooks and Simkin, 2012).  DSC did just that and this has resulted in a change to Gillette’s pricing structure.  In order to protect the brand, Gillette will alter prices by as much as 20% as of March 2017.  They have also recognised a gap in their pricing structure and vowed to fill the “white space” between their cheaper and more expensive items (Whabba, 2017).



PRICING TACTICS

Captive pricing describes the relatively low cost of a basic product with a subsequent high cost for a product needed to enhance or activate it (Dibb et al, 2016 p604).  This type of price lining is prevalent throughout the razor industry.  So much so that it is often referred to as the razor-razor blade business model (Teece, 2010).  Some suggest that that King Camp Gillette founded this model, though this has been widely discredited.  Regardless, it is still used by most razor companies with handles which can last for years being comparable in price to just one month’s quota of blades.



A psychological pricing tactic, namely odd/even pricing is employed by Gillette.  Not a single razor or blade on their website is priced at an even number (Gillette.com).  Buyers perceive odd numbered items to be less expensive, as they subconsciously assume a reference price rounded up to the nearest ten (Baines and Fill, 2014 p321).
DSC do not subscribe to this tactic and all subscriptions are priced as even numbers.  This is in keeping with their authentic no-nonsense brand image.




PROMOTION
Promotion is the way in which a company communicates with the market.  It can be used for persuasion and information sharing.  The role of a marketer with regards to promotion is to ensure that this information is targeted at the appropriate market segments (Dibb et al, 2016 p467).




DIRECT MARKETING

Direct marketing has been recognised as a useful tool to forge stronger relationships with customers (Baines and Fill, 2014 p 360).  Customised communication is used to directly connect with customers and the target market (Dibb et al, 2016 p481). 
Since DSC introduced the shave club concept, the marketing mix employed by many manufacturers in the industry has changed.  Chuang and Tai (2016) observed that the social benefits of being a member of such a club strengthens a consumer’s loyalty.  So much so that due to the increased level of interaction between the provider and consumer they may be inclined to stay loyal to the product even if they become disappointed with the performance. This is due to feeling a psychological investment.
When a customer joins a shave club they are not only signing up for a monthly subscription of razors, they are also allowing for a channel of direct marketing.  The company will have access to their email address and home address (Dollershaveclub.com and Gillette.com, 2017).  Gillette utilise this well and target their club members with exclusive coupons, promotions, free samples and information on new products.  The also intensify the inclusive club feeling by mailing their members with new ideas and shaving tips (Gillette.com, 2017).



ADVERTISING

Advertising is a way in which organisations use paid for media to communicate information about themselves and their product.  It is non-personal, wide reaching, and on a cost per person ratio it can be considered very cost effective (Dibb et al, 2016 p475). 


For the razor industry, advertising as a marketing tool can be dated back to the 18th Century.  Newspaper adverts were placed for pioneering steel razors with the emphasis being on both the quality of the product and the metallurgical skill of the manufacturer (Withey, 2012).  This message of high quality and innovation remains the emphasis of Gillette’s recent razor adverts.  Their “The best a man can get” campaign premiered in 1989 and is the tag line most consumers still associate with them (Adage, 2017). 
Gillette invest in many forms of advertising media and reach a wide audience via television, magazines, internet, newspapers and billboards (Advertising archives, 2017).  This allows them to stay in the public’s awareness and have an up to date communication of new products and innovations.  Marketing magazine (2016) suggest that Gillette do not simply market a product to men, they “market masculinity”.





SPONSORSHIP
One element of the marketing mix which polarizes competitors in the razor industry is the use of sponsorship, particularly with regards to celebrity endorsements.  Sponsorship is defined as support, either financial or material, from an unrelated donor (Dibb et al, 2016 p479).  The benefit of sponsorship to an organisation is to generate brand awareness and exploit positive associations to a target market (Baines and Fill, 2014 p398).
Gillette have used sponsorship in many forms to promote their brand.  Their most favoured method is celebrity endorsement.  By using aspirational brand ambassadors such as David Beckham, Roger Federer and Lionel Messi, Gillette are aligning their products with success, power and respect.  Most recently they have tapped into current trends and recruited online gaming star Enrique Cedeno Martnez, known in the gaming realm as xPeke (Lang, 2017).  Gillette also sponsor beautiful and successful female brand ambassadors, such as Jennifer Lopez and Emma Willis to promote their Venus razors (Advertising archives, 2017).  DSC by contrast mock celebrity endorsements, asking in their promotional video “do you like paying 20 bucks for razors? 19 of them go to Rodger Federer”.



Lionel Messi and Roger Federer have both been sponsored by Gillette.

In 1938, Gillette president Joseph P. Sprang Jr significantly increased their advertising budget.  They have since sponsored many events, such as baseball world series, beauty pageants, boxing events and the super bowl (Adage, 2017).  They also pay $7 million annually for the New England Patriots “Gillette Stadium” (McMahon et at, 2016).





Within a seemingly similar market such as the razor industry, diverse approaches to the 4 Ps of the marketing mix are exploited.  Organisations within the industry employ opposing yet successful marketing approaches.
For DSC their main marketing objectives are honesty, fun and relatability.  When they entered the market their unique use of the marketing mix not only gave them instant success but also changed the paradigm of the industry. Straight forward pricing and distribution along with the sharp humour of their video marketing have proved exceptionally successful tools. 
Gillette employ more traditional tactics which have been established in the industry since the 18th century.  They use the marketing mix to emphasize their innovation and product superiority.  Their application of the marketing mix asserts them as powerful industry leaders.  They make use of celebrity affiliations to reinforce their image, and their distribution and advertising models make sure that they are always in close proximity to consumers, both physically and psychologically. 

THE MARKETING MIX OF THE RAZOR INDUSTRY The marketing mix is described by Dibb et al as a “ toolkit ” utilised by organisations to...